Messerschmitt Me P.1092/2
In the summer of 1943, Messerschmitt built on an earlier design, theMesserschmitt Me P.1092A, with a further series of small, single-seat, single-jet fighters. Hans Hornung led the design team, along with Woldemar Voigt and Willie Messerschmitt himself. The first design, the Me P.1092/1, was very similar to the Messerschmitt Me P.1092A, except a normal fin/rudder and horizontal tail planes were fitted to the rear, a variable sweep wing was added and the nosewheel was located aft of the air intake.
With the Me P.1092/2, Messerschmitt changed the overall look of the P.1092. The fuselage was short and squat, and the cockpit was faired into the rear fuselage where the tail section began. The wings (mounted mid-fuselage, with slight dihedral) were swept back at 21.5 degrees, and a provision was made in the design for an extended wing. Again, the outer wing sections of the Me 262 were used (for the extended wing version). Fuel capacity was increased to 1250 liters (274 gallons), which was achieved by rearranging the internal components. A more conventional tail unit was designed, and was mounted on a boom under which the single Jumo 004C (1015 kg, 2237 lbs thrust) exhausted. Also, the tail unit, with it's single fin and rudder and high mounted tail planes, resembled the Messerschmitt Me 262 tail. The landing gear arrangement was of a tricycle type, with the main gear retracting inwards, and the forward gear retracted to the rear. Armament was fairly heavy for a small fighter; it consisted of two MK 103 30mm cannon (the length of the MK 103 necessitated that the barrels protruded from the fuselage) and two MG 151/15 15mm cannon. All guns were mounted in the forward fuselage on either side of the air intake.
The Me P.1092/2 was used in a performance comparison with the Lippisch Me P.20. The P.1092/2 was judged superior in almost all categories. Although the Me P.1092/2 was not constructed, it was used to gain experience and design knowledge, especially with the later Me P.1106 and Me P.1101 designs.

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/2 Dimensions
Normal Wing
Span7.75 m
Length8.1 m
Height 3.65 m
Wing Area 12.7 m²
Aspect Ratio 4.73:1
Extended Wing
Span 10.0 m
Length 8.1 m
Height 3.65 m
Wing Area 14.45 m²
Aspect Ratio 6.92:1

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/2 Weights
Normal Wing
Empty Equipped Weight 2626 kg
Loaded Weight* 3664 kg
Max Wing Loading 288.5 kg/m²
Extended Wing
Empty Equipped Weight 2692 kg
Loaded Weight* 3730 kg
Max Wing Loading - kg/m²
* with 750 kg (1652 lbs) fuel load, approximately 1000 liters (220 gallons)

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/2 Performance
NormalWing
Rate of Climb 18.4 m/sec
Ceiling11200 m
Max. Endurance*1.26 hours
Max Range870 km / 11000 m
Takeoff Run 690 m
Max Speed** 931 km/h
Extended Wing
Rate of Climb 18.3 m/sec
Ceiling 12100 m
Max. Endurance* 1.59 hours
Max Range 970 km / 11800 m
Takeoff Run 914 m
* at 10000 m (32800 ft)
** at 6000 m (19700 ft)

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/3
With the Messerschmitt Me P.1092/3 design, the design team made more changes to the P.1092. The cockpit was moved to the rear, where it was faired into the single vertical fin. The air intake was now divided into two intakes, located beneath the nose, and fed the single Jumo 004C jet engine. The landing gear remained more or less the same, and with the forward fuselage now unoccupied, a heavier armament of four MK 108 30mm cannon could be concentrated in the nose. This Messerschmitt design bears a resemblance to the later Me P.1106, and the same problems would have surfaced; namely, pilot visibility from the cockpit located so far in the rear.
Messerschmitt Me P.1092/3 Dimensions
Span9.4 m
Length8.1 m
Height3.6 m
Wing Area12.7 m²
Aspect Ratio7.0:1

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/4
1. The three-view of the earlier designed Messerschmitt Me P.1092/4. The major differences are the cranked, gull-wing and the landing gear arrangement. An external bomb load could also be carried beneath the fuselage.
2. The Me P.1092 design was further refined with the P.1092/4 design. The fuselage remained similar to that of the Me P.1092/3, but the cockpit was moved to the extreme forward fuselage which afforded the pilot a much better view. As in the previous design, the wing was swept back at 18 degrees. The wing, tail and control systems were mostly borrowed from the Me 262 design. The same air intake and turbojet remained from the previous Me P.1092/3 design. Although the cockpit now took up much of the space in the nose where the weapons were mounted previously, there was still room for four MK 108 30mm cannon; these were located further aft on the fuselage sides.

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/4 Dimensions
Span 9.4 m
Length 8.1 m
Height 3.6 m
Wing Area 12.7 m²
Aspect Ratio 7.0:1
The Messerschmitt Me P.1092/4 weights and performances should be comparable to the Me P.1092/2

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/5
This final design of the Messerschmitt Me P.1092 series was another refinement of the previous, Me P.1092/4 design. The cockpit was again moved, this time back to its original location (from the first Me P.1092А design) above the wings. Again, the wing and tail were taken from the Me 262, and the air intake and jet engine remained from the previous P.1092 designs. Armament consisted of four MK 108 30mm cannon, located on the fuselage sides.
The Me P.1092 series of designs went no further than the drawing board. However, the design work and performance calculations formed the basis of the later Me P.1106 and even the Me P.1101 projects.

Messerschmitt Me P.1092/5 Dimensions
Span9.4 m
Length 8.1 m
Height 3.6 m
Wing Area 12.7 m²
Aspect Ratio7.0:1
The Messerschmitt Me P.1092/5 weights and performances should be comparable to the Me P.1092/2

...еще одна рюмка....:russian:...и я заставлю тебя уважать непонимающих

...в чем моя провинилася???:sorry: